<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less Room to Fall for Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathangoldberg.com/2009/09/less-room-to-fall-for-value.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathangoldberg.com/2009/09/less-room-to-fall-for-value.html</link>
	<description>Investment ideas, research findings and general discussion of all things value investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:32:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathangoldberg.com/2009/09/less-room-to-fall-for-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>pritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caratsplus.com/?p=26#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Although it is almost certainly true (don&#039;t have the data to back this up...) that a basket of stocks trading below intrinsic will dip less than the average in a downturn I don&#039;t think this is their greatest advantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The margin of safety seeks to provide protection against *permanent loss*. Short term fluctuations can and will result in paper losses. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A stock purchased solely for the future growth potential of the stock itself seeks no such protection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For me, this is the greatest advantage of value over growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it is almost certainly true (don&#39;t have the data to back this up&#8230;) that a basket of stocks trading below intrinsic will dip less than the average in a downturn I don&#39;t think this is their greatest advantage.</p>
<p>The margin of safety seeks to provide protection against *permanent loss*. Short term fluctuations can and will result in paper losses. </p>
<p>A stock purchased solely for the future growth potential of the stock itself seeks no such protection.</p>
<p>For me, this is the greatest advantage of value over growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathangoldberg.com/2009/09/less-room-to-fall-for-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caratsplus.com/?p=26#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Well said, pritchie. What I meant about value investments is that perhaps they have less room to fall than growth as they are already well below true value.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for the comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best,&lt;br /&gt;Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, pritchie. What I meant about value investments is that perhaps they have less room to fall than growth as they are already well below true value.</p>
<p>Thank you for the comment.</p>
<p>Best,<br />Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathangoldberg.com/2009/09/less-room-to-fall-for-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>pritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caratsplus.com/?p=26#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Daily price fluctuations are mostly noise and watching them too closely can be very dangerous psychologically (we tend to feel negative emotions more strongly than positive ones).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fooled by Randomness by Nassim Taleb has a great example of this (table 3.1 p65). If we assume a hypothetical stock w/ 15% gain and 10% volatility per year we would expect see a daily increase in the price 54% of the time. *inversely* the stock would be down 46% of the time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Daily fluctuations have lots of noise but very little signal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, it&#039;s good to keep in mind that buying below intrinsic value offers no guarantee that the price will not decline further...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall I agree with you, watch for press releases and especially new financial statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily price fluctuations are mostly noise and watching them too closely can be very dangerous psychologically (we tend to feel negative emotions more strongly than positive ones).</p>
<p>Fooled by Randomness by Nassim Taleb has a great example of this (table 3.1 p65). If we assume a hypothetical stock w/ 15% gain and 10% volatility per year we would expect see a daily increase in the price 54% of the time. *inversely* the stock would be down 46% of the time.</p>
<p>Daily fluctuations have lots of noise but very little signal.</p>
<p>Also, it&#39;s good to keep in mind that buying below intrinsic value offers no guarantee that the price will not decline further&#8230;</p>
<p>Overall I agree with you, watch for press releases and especially new financial statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
